Definition: And changed his prison garments: and he did eat bread continually before him all the days of his life.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 25:29. It’s a really powerful and dramatic passage about a man who was severely beaten and imprisoned. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: He was beaten badly: The verse tells us that King Hezekiah of Judah was brutally beaten, likely multiple times, by his enemies. This was a terrible punishment for a serious transgression. Changed his prison garments: Hezekiah’s clothes were completely replaced with new, nicer ones. It wasn't just a simple change; it showed he was now in a position of comfort and dignity. Eaten bread continuously before him all the days of his life: This is the really significant part. Hezekiah didn’t just eat bread occasionally. He continually ate bread – every single day, for the rest of his life. It meant he was living in a state of constant, unwavering comfort and nourishment. What it's saying about him: This verse speaks to a man who was utterly deprived of everything that made life meaningful: Loss of Dignity: The new clothes and constant eating of bread symbolize a loss of his former status and dignity. He wasn’t just surviving; he was being treated like royalty. Constant Suffering: It highlights a pattern of intense suffering and punishment. It suggests that the punishment wasn't just about him being beaten, but about his entire life being marked by hardship. Overall Meaning & Interpretation: This verse paints a picture of a man who was utterly consumed by misery and despair. He was trapped in a cycle of torment and deprivation. It’s often interpreted as a symbol of a person struggling with deep psychological or spiritual pain, perhaps feeling hopeless and forgotten. Important Note: The Bible doesn't always provide a clear explanation of why this happened to Hezekiah. It’s often seen as a consequence of his actions – a direct result of his disobedience. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the context of this passage in more detail (like its timing)? Explore possible interpretations of the meaning behind it?